Відео

A infinite mate actually can be made in no 50 move rule and infinite chess.

“Hah, you didn’t see the bishop on zzzd353035!

We might actually resign from life ⚰️ before we decide to resign the game 😂!!

well how about breaking the fundamental rules of the reality and find mate in √-44

could you construct a position where both black and white could checkmate eachother (a.k.a neither have a forced checkmate) but it is impossible to stalemate? so that there is no branch in the game tree where black or white is in stalemate.

It's not actually the 50 move rule, it's a draw if one of the players claim a draw, it's a forced draw after 75 moves

if ω^4 is not stupidly long itself for you then if every anoucment would be 100 the game would lasts 100 000 000 ( 100 million ) moves

Bishop is a menace in this chess board

I'll bet I would do all the moves and blunder away the checkmate at the end

This video made me cry while watching this at 12am

"What?! How is this not checkmate?" That one bishop on Z781: 👻

how long is that bishop cannon 😭😭

Somehow you managed to fit ordinal collapsing functions into a chess video.

7:35 But if the rook moves then the king will keep moving forever

Hold on what is white doing in the intro 1. e3 e6 - okay, already dumb. 2. e4 - somewhere, GothamChess fell out of a chair

“You know what, let’s call it a draw”

2:05 Is there any proof why is the bound of n for mate-in-n always finite for finite chess?

I took acid before watching this video

I before I heard the name of the omega one, I thought it was Absolute Infinity

Wait, if we can construct the 3 index+, Can't we use e's to make it bigger

4:21 just move the rook to the left or right.

Wait, at 4:01 you can take the right pawn with a rook.

"The most realistic positions"

"A bigger infinity": Let's say we have infinity A and infinity B; iA and iB. Where iB is the bigger infiity. I would say: it is the same as dividing by zero. It is not possible. Because you can't count to iA and you can't count to iB; both possibilities are zero. Let's say ZeroA for counting to iA, and ZeroB for counting to iB. To see the difference in size, you have to divide ZeroB by ZeroA. But as ZeroA is 0, you are dividing by zero. Therefore "A bigger infinity" is the same as dividing by zero: it is simply not possible. You can't have a "bigger infinity".

That Mate in omega position isnt just moving the rook TREE(3) spaces far, all i need to do is to move the middle rook away :D

I hate when my opponent plays Qd(10^301)

im sorry to tell u navary but u are wrong in the first example u gave after black moves the rook up)lets say white king is on e2 pawn d2 pawn g3 qd2 rf4 and for black ke5 and rooks e6 c6 g6 ) white has Qd7 and mates with re5 and c4

What is this video about?

You have infinite board now Is it possible to add other board games like go to this? Especially because the rules of Go are very simple I must experience infinite go before death And I will probably never see it Because no one is as crazy as you to want to make something like that (take this as a compliment)

If it was 3d infinite chess we could reach w_1

Wouldn't the first position without those black rooks be mate in Ω?

Thanks for the video! This video is very interesting

I was playing a chess game for 10 MINUTES AND YOU SCREWED UP MY BOARD NOW YOU GOTTA PUT IT ALL BACK

imagine pawn sisyphus trying to reach the end to become queen...

2:33 Bro was exiled💀

Sore loser tech geek gets tired of losing in classical chess, so creates boundary-less chess (i.e. NOT CHESS.)

White on the air checkmate move: Oh shit, I didn’t line it up-

Now you need to create real chess, where there are no squares so you _can_ get mate in Ω.

Look its diagonaliztion

Would 3d chess influence it at all. Probably not since the infinite levels of 2d space wouldnt make Omega.

Imagine blundering mate in Church-Kleene Ordinal

Now make infinite go

Meanwhile hikaru seeing mate in omega one

Ok but what about Ω-1?

Infinite pieces maybe just maybe destroys the value of the pieces Is there a special method or arrangement for pieces to fix this possible problem?

. CK How to mate in ω 1 Step 1: Get a rook Step 2: Mate with rook

ε ζ η φ Γ Ψ Ω

How do you promote??

75% of the video: actual chess stuff The last 25% at the end: Super complicated math lesson about ordinals brought to you by Naviary

I have serious doubt a chess engine can ever be created for infinite chess, as there would simply be too much legal moves for the engine to even reach a depth of 1. Sure, you could create a move distance limit, but i still think it would be extremely hard. And the engine would likely be extremely slow.